Imogen Thomas is back for Nuts Magazine

ImogenTNuts20Aug2013_01Imogen Thomas has actually been gone now for a little over a year. Frankly I don’t know where she went, and why she went away, but whatever, she’s back now.

7 comments for “Imogen Thomas is back for Nuts Magazine

  1. I LOVE NUTS MAGAZINE
    August 29, 2013 at 2:35 pm

    @Pefr

    I don’t understand how Nuts have the cheek to do that though. Maybe it’s because brain-dead people actually walk into a shop and buy this magazine because a “famous face” is on the front of it. And Nuts takes advantage of these people by producing this shit every week.

    Why don’t they just keep their magazines from five or six years ago (which were much cheaper too) instead of blowing a load of money on useless, non-sexy pictures??

  2. Pefr
    August 22, 2013 at 10:51 am

    @ I LOVE NUTS MAGAZINE

    Because she shifts a lot of magazines. She doesn’t have to go topless for people to buy it. Obviously more people would if she did, but they’re not wankers. She sells magazines. Simple as.

  3. I LOVE NUTS MAGAZINE
    August 22, 2013 at 7:12 am

    Yet again Nuts serves up boring pictures of has-been, talentless reality TV stars.

    Why can’t they find new girls who are not just famous for being on reality TV?

    I mean, nearly two quid for a bunch of non-topless pictures of a model who has gone topless loads of times before? Where do they get the cheek to do that?

    Nuts are wankers.

  4. Pefr
    August 21, 2013 at 2:32 pm

    Love that body! *drool*

    Unfortunately George, she’s one of those glamour models who’s now so famous (Danielle Lloyd is another) that they don’t have to go topless to book shoots any more.

  5. George
    August 21, 2013 at 10:28 am

    She got pregnant, so a MILF without doubt. Great to have her back, though surprisingly not topless

  6. Joe
    August 20, 2013 at 6:08 pm

    She’s a MILF now, hence the absence. And damn, what a MILF!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.